Week 6
Week 6: MCP, Evaluation, and LLMOps
MCP, tracing, evals, cost, compliance-aware logging, and post-launch operations.
This lesson introduces MCP as a structured way for models to interact with external capabilities through explicit contracts.
Week 6
MCP, tracing, evals, cost, compliance-aware logging, and post-launch operations.
This lesson introduces MCP as a structured way for models to interact with external capabilities through explicit contracts.
Checkpoint
LLMOps GateThis week ends with a gated checkpoint. You progress by shipping a real artifact, not by reading passively.
Deliverable
An evaluation scorecard and post-launch monitoring plan.Each week leaves behind portfolio evidence that compounds into the final SaaS and its operating narrative.
Week Thesis
This lesson introduces MCP as a structured way for models to interact with external capabilities through explicit contracts.
Without a clean tool boundary, model integrations become one-off hacks with inconsistent semantics, poor auditability, and weak control over capabilities.
MCP is not the product. It is the boundary layer between model reasoning and external tools or context providers. Good boundaries make systems composable and governable.
This lesson teaches how to make AI system quality visible through traces, evals, and cost-aware instrumentation.
Lesson Stack
Lesson Preview
MCP is a tool boundary and integration contract, not a trend checkbox.
This lesson introduces MCP as a structured way for models to interact with external capabilities through explicit contracts.
Without a clean tool boundary, model integrations become one-off hacks with inconsistent semantics, poor auditability, and weak control over capabilities.
MCP is not the product. It is the boundary layer between model reasoning and external tools or context providers. Good boundaries make systems composable and governable.
Lesson Preview
If you only inspect outcomes manually, you are flying blind.
This lesson teaches how to make AI system quality visible through traces, evals, and cost-aware instrumentation.
Without structured evaluation, teams mistake vivid examples for real quality. Without traces and cost telemetry, they cannot explain regressions or runaway spend.
Observability answers what happened. Evaluation answers whether it was good. Cost accountability answers whether it was worth it.
Lesson Preview
AI systems require care after launch, not just before launch.
This lesson brings governance into the operating loop: handling sensitive data, preserving auditability, and defining what to watch after launch.
Many teams think launch is the finish line. For AI products, launch is the beginning of continuous evidence collection about drift, misuse, and user harm.
Post-market monitoring means you assume the system will surprise you. Your job is to create the telemetry, review loop, and intervention paths needed when it does.
Portfolio Artifact
scorecard
A rubric-driven eval scorecard for quality, cost, and failure monitoring.